Why Robert Millar is the coolest British rider ever

Rober Millar isn’t just Great Britain’s best climber and Grand tour finisher, he’s where my love of road cycling springs from and an inimitable icon.

The piece below has been doing the rounds of cycling fora over the last couple of days. It features Millar, late in his career, revisiting his home town of Glasgow with a French television crew in tow. Unsurprisingly, he’s word-perfect in French and idiomatic with it to boot. That is quite some skill.

I’ve been trying to piece together my earliest cycling memories because I’ve always struggled to remember where the seed was planted that has lead to what is now a 20-year obsession with the Tour De France. I think it begins with the 1989 Tour and Robert Millar‘s stage 10 victory.

I’ve come to this conclusion because of the relics as much as anything: a Peugeot Equipe boy’s racer which belongs to my brother. He also has somewhere a pair of Z-team mitts and I’m certain he had the jersey as well. That year Millar rode for Z-Peugeot.

I can vaguely recall being glued to the Channel 4 coverage that year as that was the year I won a scholarship to Bradfield College, but really I was more fascinated by cricket at the time. My mum’s Guyanese, cricket to West Indians being a matter as serious as cycling is to Italians.

But I was jealous of my brother’s bike and kit, that much I can remember. Millar’s was nothing like it but every child dreams a bit to covers the gaps in reality. We probably tried to imitate Millar on the hill near our house that led up the railway bridge, me on my Mark 2 Raleigh Burner, him on the Peugeot or his Mark 2 Night Burner.

As the years went by I used to look at the Peugeot in the garage and think about riding more. But I ended up with a god-awful Peugeot mountain bike on which the backend was so poorly built that the wheel pulled off to one side under any pressure on the pedals. That put me off riding for ages.

When I rediscovered cycling I rediscovered Millar as well, a guy so cool he featured in The Face magazine at a time when it was the hippest thing in the newsagent.

Posted in Bikes, Clothing, Professional, Video | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Women’s race at Smithfield Nocturne 2009

A women’s race has been one of the big missing components from the Smithfield Nocturne‘s first two editions. But in 2009 that is set to change with the announcement of the Women’s Elite Criterium in the programme.

Having recently started writing about that side of the sport I think it’s fair to say that its omission was as much a reflection of the likely numbers as anything. A couple of years ago you would perhaps have been pushed to get a decent sized field.

This year, from what I’ve seen, there should be more than enough competitive women in London and the South East to make up the required numbers. My understanding is that they need 30 entries for it to take place. It says E123, which might miss out a huge swathe of women who are just coming into the sport this season as 4th Cats, but if you’ve got the points, make it a date.

Here’s what the course looks like

And here’s my top reasons why you should sign up to ride it:

1. It is the most fantastic atmosphere to ride in. Having ridden the folding bike and Press/All-Star races the last two years I can safely say that there a few occasions when a lumper like me gets to feel like a pro and hear the massive roar of people packed in all round the course.

2. It’s a fantastic course to ride. It may not look much on paper but the bottom corners on Snow Hill are fast and the sort of thing that gives you butterflies. In fact all the corners are exciting to ride and it’s so fast that you are buzzing all the way round, totally ignoring how much it hurts to be riding that fast.

3. You owe it to yourself to ride. Charlie Easton has been a big agitator for getting it to happen and credit to James Pope at Face Partnership for responding in the right way to the criticisms about the lack of a women’s race. It’s now up to you to make sure it happens.

So if you know a woman who races and holds an E123 licence, then sign up. The price tag is, in my opinion, a good reflection of what it costs to make races like this happen. It’s also a good reflection of how good racing at Smithfield is.

I might not get the chance to show my lack of speed this year but if it means that women’s racing has a place at this high profile event, then I’m more than happy to cede my place on the circuit.

So make sure you sign up for the Women’s Elite Criterium at the Smithfield Nocturne

Posted in Road Racing, Women | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How to look and ride like a Pro

Contrary to what many may tell you, looking and riding like you are a professional is important. You look good and you feel good on the bike, it really is as simple as that.

Some follow a code of practice laid down on Facebook in the The Official Rules of the Euro Cyclist but in my book it’s good but no maillot arc-en-ciel.

At the heart of the issue is what it is to be a European Professional: you are paid to wear the name of your sponsors on your kit and ride a bike from the manufacturer supplying the team. If you are not benefiting financially from a sponsors name, then it makes no sense to wear it.

So my take is that if you aspire to the ethic and aesthetic of a European professional, the most pro thing to wear as an amateur is unbranded kit. Failing that, you should wear the kit of your chosen club. But, and this is important, you should avoid mixing club and unbranded kit when out riding.

The shoe

One of the most common items perceived to be pro are white shoes. Now I’d agree to some extent, what with being the owner of a pair (Specialized S-Works Boa 2005-06 model with the red and black detailing). But they’re a relatively recent development in the European peloton and the result of Italian vanity.

For me, the most pro choice of footwear is simple: plain black shoes in leather. Adidas did a modern take on the classic in 2008 which for me is as close as any modern cycling shoe has come to meeting the aesthetic requirements as well as being functional :

Adidas Super Classic Cycling Shoe

The sock

The only qualifier to this is one rule which holds true regardless of what dress code you subscribe to: white socks, and short ones at that. A good cycling sock should come no higher than the point at which the calf muscle starts, essentially covering the Achilles tendon and not much more.

Obviously enough, these rules are made to be broken but it is knowing when to break them that matters. So (Guy Andrews look away now) black socks are acceptable if they are worn with non-black shoes. This rule may also be disregarded if your club kit features black socks, which mine does. It pains me, but that’s the way it is and if we are to observe the no mixing club and plain kit then it must remain so.

The shorts

I’ve read a lot about how European and stylish white shorts are. Truth be told, they are neither. It’s a simple test: Who looks cooler as World Champion, Eddy Merckx or Paolo Bettini? No contest.

The most pro of shorts is black. Sponsor’s name running parallel to the hem where there is one is the perfect form but along the thigh is also acceptable. To accommodate more modern tastes, side panels bearing branding or corresponding to the jersey, as part of a club kit, are also acceptable. But the key rule here is that that the predominant colour is black.

Just because Mario Cippolini looked good and could rock the look FTW, doesn’t mean anyone else can or should. Comparatively there’s about 90 years worth of riders looking cool in black shorts to 20 years of some of the most ridiculous looks imaginable, the apotheosis of which is either the Carrera denim look or Michael Rasmussen’s cheese string in motion teaming of yellow shorts with the Maillot Jaune.

The jersey

This is simple: if you didn’t earn it, you shouldn’t wear it. So no World Champion’s stripes, no national champions jerseys, no leader’s jerseys (yellow, pink, green polka dot and so on).

On a basic level, it’s rude to those who have spent a lifetime earning the right to wear them, even if it is for only a day, and who can get fined by the UCI for not doing so. On a more practical level, it avoids having to deal with the torrent of low quality abuse from those around you for choosing to wear the jersey.

Note here: I don’t rule out the wearing of professional team jerseys. Fine on their own for current teams, but defunct or “classic” teams are preferable. There’s days when it’s entirely permissible to pull on a Z-team jersey and dream of being Robert Millar. Heck I’d actively encourage it.

Robert Millar

But remember: a jersey is fine but full kit is the equivalent of being the kid who turns up for a kickabout in the park in full Chelsea strip.

The headgear

If you want the helmet debate, leave now. In my view cycling has been rendered massively less stylish by the introduction of compulsory helmets in races. Pros wear caps, casquette, biretta. Call it what you want, they wear a cap, the style being individual to the rider. Or they wear nothing at all, their hair being all the protection they need.

Posted in Clothing, Professional | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment